Ever­yo­ne is redis­co­ve­ring the pho­ne. Good sales teams had never put it down. Becau­se Lin­ke­dIn and other social media crea­te visi­bi­li­ty – con­ver­sa­ti­ons crea­te cla­ri­ty. The lis­te­ner is back, even though he was never gone.

📋 Con­clu­si­on

The tele­pho­ne is curr­ent­ly being cele­bra­ted as a new dis­co­very on Lin­ke­dIn – alt­hough pro­fes­sio­nal sales teams had never put the pho­ne down. This post puts the deba­te in per­spec­ti­ve: Lin­ke­dIn, con­tent, email, AI, and auto­ma­ti­on crea­te visi­bi­li­ty and reach, but visi­bi­li­ty alo­ne is not sales. Only per­so­nal dia­lo­gue turns a data set into a qua­li­fied cont­act. You will learn at which points in a mul­tich­an­nel pro­cess the tele­pho­ne is the decisi­ve link, how you can qua­li­fy with BANT and an ABC clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on – and why your next orders may have long sin­ce been in your own CRM. 

⏱️ Rea­ding time: approx. 8 minutes

Suddenly, everyone discovers the phone

It is a remar­kab­le spec­ta­cle. For years, the tele­pho­ne was the chan­nel in B2B sales that was only tal­ked about with a wrink­led nose in cer­tain cir­cles. And now, sud­den­ly, the same feeds are fil­ling up with a new rea­liza­ti­on: You have to call again. 

So that this artic­le does not beco­me a misun­derstan­ding: This is not a plea to switch off all digi­tal chan­nels and march back to the dial. It’s a plea to rethink sales for what it is – a pro­cess that intel­li­gent­ly con­nects peo­p­le and channels. 

ComCare 360 GmbH - From "Post and Pray" to Predictable Sales: Why the Phone Never Went Away in B2B - 2

“Post and Pray” hits the quiet cor­ner of the pho­ne: While the feed glows with likes, reach and fol­lo­wers, order inta­ke and sales wait in vain for a conversation.

Why the narrative of sales without a telephone was so successful

The the­sis of tele­pho­ne-free sales was so suc­cessful becau­se it hit a sore spot. Becau­se let’s be honest: Hard­ly anyo­ne likes to make pho­ne calls in a sales context. 

And this does not only app­ly to clas­sic cold cal­ling. The agreed call­back, the fol­low-up to an offer, the pre­vious inte­res­ted par­ty, the exis­ting cus­to­mer – all this cos­ts over­co­ming. A post is easier to wri­te than a pho­ne call is made. A mes­sa­ge can be for­mu­la­ted, cor­rec­ted and sche­du­led at your lei­su­re. A pho­ne call requi­res you to be pre­sent at the same moment, to react and to expect a real reac­tion from the other person. 

The mes­sa­ge “You don’t have to call any­mo­re” was the­r­e­fo­re less a sales insight than a temp­ting pro­mi­se. It freed from some­thing uncom­for­ta­ble. The fact that it was so rea­di­ly belie­ved says more about our rela­ti­onship to tele­pho­ning than about the actu­al effec­ti­ve­ness of sales channels. 

The difference between visibility and sales

This is whe­re the real error in thin­king lies. Lin­ke­dIn, con­tent and social media can gene­ra­te atten­ti­on and visi­bi­li­ty. Howe­ver, visi­bi­li­ty is not yet a con­ver­sa­ti­on, not a qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on, not an appoint­ment and not an order. 

If you only publish con­tent, send mes­sa­ges and then wait for someone to get in touch, you are not sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly cul­ti­vat­ing the mar­ket. He does “post and pray”: post, send – and pray that some­thing will come back. 

The pro­blem with “Post and Pray” is not the indi­vi­du­al post or mes­sa­ge. The pro­blem is the lack of a sequel. Atten­ti­on that is not trans­fer­red to a con­cre­te next step fizz­les out. And a signi­fi­cant part of the sales suc­cess is thus left to chan­ce – the hope that the right per­son sees the right con­tri­bu­ti­on at the right time and takes action on their own.

Why people remain important at crucial points

Espe­ci­al­ly in B2B, it’s rare­ly about fast, exch­an­geable purcha­ses. It is about com­plex decis­i­ons that requi­re expl­ana­ti­on and are eco­no­mic­al­ly rele­vant. And befo­re such decis­i­ons, mana­ging direc­tors, purcha­sing mana­gers and sales mana­gers usual­ly want to talk to a poten­ti­al part­ner in per­son again. 

This is not just about fac­tu­al argu­ments and a lack of infor­ma­ti­on. It’s about trust, com­mit­ment, sym­pa­thy and the fee­ling of working with the right peo­p­le. This dimen­si­on sim­ply can­not be read from likes, clicks or auto­ma­ted reac­tions. It is crea­ted in direct dia­lo­gue bet­ween two people. 

In addi­ti­on, the­re is an often over­loo­ked point: Many rele­vant top decis­i­on-makers do not spend their day on Lin­ke­dIn. They don’t read every post, don’t see every mes­sa­ge, and don’t respond to every digi­tal cont­act attempt. If you rely exclu­si­ve­ly on being noti­ced online, you are igno­ring a signi­fi­cant part of the very peo­p­le you actual­ly want to reach.

The phone as part of a multichannel process

So that the­re is no new misun­derstan­ding here: The pho­ne is not play­ed off against Lin­ke­dIn, email, con­tent, auto­ma­ti­on or AI. On the con­tra­ry. Each of the­se chan­nels has its jus­ti­fi­ca­ti­on – and its spe­ci­fic role in the process.

Lin­ke­dIn & Social

Visi­bi­li­ty & Reach

Con­tent

Impar­ting competence

Email & Outreach

Speech

Auto­ma­ti­on

Speed in the process

Arti­fi­ci­al Intelligence

Rese­arch, prio­ri­tiza­ti­on, preparation

Tele­pho­ne

Cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on, qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on, commitment

Lin­ke­dIn and other digi­tal chan­nels crea­te awa­re­ness. Con­tent con­veys com­pe­tence. Auto­ma­ti­on acce­le­ra­tes pro­ces­ses. Arti­fi­ci­al intel­li­gence rese­ar­ches data, prio­ri­ti­zes cont­acts, pre­pa­res con­ver­sa­ti­ons, and sup­ports your employees. All of this is sen­si­ble and modern. But it does not replace the moment when a cont­act beco­mes a relationship. 

This is exact­ly whe­re the role of the tele­pho­ne lies. It is neither an out­da­ted chan­nel nor the new panacea. At cer­tain points in the pro­cess, the  cru­cial link: bet­ween visi­bi­li­ty and cont­act, bet­ween cont­act and qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on, bet­ween inte­rest and appoint­ment and bet­ween appoint­ment and con­cre­te busi­ness relationship.

So the lis­te­ner is not the enti­re dis­tri­bu­tor. At the cru­cial points, howe­ver, it is the next step that makes ever­y­thing else effective. 

The phone as part of a multichannel process

Each chan­nel has its jus­ti­fi­ca­ti­on – and its spe­ci­fic task in the process.

Lin­ke­dIn & Social

Visi­bi­li­ty & Reach

Con­tent

Impar­ting competence

Email & Outreach

Speech

Auto­ma­ti­on

Speed in the process

Arti­fi­ci­al Intelligence

Rese­arch, prio­ri­tiza­ti­on, preparation

Tele­pho­ne

Cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on, qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on, commitment

This is exact­ly whe­re the role of the tele­pho­ne lies. It is the cru­cial link at cer­tain points in the process.

What can be clarified in a phone call

An important point in advan­ce, becau­se it is so often misun­ders­tood: Tal­king on the pho­ne does not auto­ma­ti­cal­ly mean sel­ling. A good con­ver­sa­ti­on does not have to pro­du­ce a deal in the end. It often does some­thing much more valuable – it crea­tes clarity. 

A sin­gle pho­ne call can ser­ve, among other things, to:

  • Iden­ti­fy the right cont­act person,
  • get to know a cont­act in person,
  • under­stand the actu­al needs and situa­ti­on of the company,
  • Qua­li­fy a lead and sche­du­le an appointment
  • to send rele­vant infor­ma­ti­on in a tar­ge­ted manner,
  • set a spe­ci­fic fol­low-up date,
  • Reac­ti­va­te an exis­ting cont­act or win back a for­mer customer,
  • dis­co­ver addi­tio­nal poten­ti­al with exis­ting customers.

The pho­ne call turns an anony­mous data set into an actu­al dia­lo­gue. And it is this dia­lo­gue that makes a sales pro­cess con­troll­able in the first place. 

BANT and ABC: Structure for good conversations

In per­so­nal dia­lo­gue, infor­ma­ti­on can be coll­ec­ted that is not reco­gnizable through pure visi­bi­li­ty or digi­tal reac­tions. To ensu­re that a con­ver­sa­ti­on does not slip into arbi­trar­i­ne­ss, a simp­le ori­en­ta­ti­on helps. The BANT prin­ci­ple has pro­ven itself:

Bud­get

Is the­re a rea­li­stic finan­cial frame­work in principle?

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Are you tal­king to a decis­i­on-maker, a stake­hol­der or a rele­vant multiplier?

Need

Is the­re a con­cre­te need, a pro­blem or a rele­vant goal?

Timing

When could or should the topic be implemented?

BANT and ABC: Structure for good conversations

Bud­get

Is the­re a rea­li­stic finan­cial frame­work in principle?

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Are you tal­king to a decis­i­on-maker, a stake­hol­der or a rele­vant multiplier?

Need

Is the­re a con­cre­te need, a pro­blem or a rele­vant goal?

Timing

When could or should the topic be implemented?

It is important to note that BANT is not a rigid inter­ro­ga­ti­on sche­me. It is not a mat­ter of ticking off four ques­ti­ons mecha­ni­cal­ly, but of under­stan­ding in con­ver­sa­ti­on whe­ther and how a cont­act can be meaningful­ly pro­ces­sed further. 

On this basis, cont­acts can be divi­ded into A, B and C leads for fur­ther processing:

A‑Leads

The­re is a con­cre­te need, and the cont­act is rea­dy to make an appoint­ment in a time­ly manner.

Next step: Make an appoint­ment and prepa­re properly.

B‑Leads

The­re is basic inte­rest, but the cont­act would first like to recei­ve infor­ma­ti­on, con­sult intern­al­ly or still needs time.

Next step: Send rele­vant infor­ma­ti­on and agree on a spe­ci­fic fol­low-up time.

C‑Leads

Curr­ent­ly, the­re is no con­cre­te need or sui­ta­ble timing. The cont­act will be taken into account for a later approach – in com­pli­ance with the appli­ca­ble legal requirements. 

Next step: Docu­ment sen­si­bly and check again at the appro­pria­te time.

On this basis, cont­acts can be divi­ded into A, B and C leads:

A‑Leads

The­re is a con­cre­te need, and the cont­act is rea­dy to make an appoint­ment in a time­ly manner.

Next step: Make an appoint­ment and prepa­re properly.

B‑Leads

The­re is basic inte­rest, but the cont­act would first like to recei­ve infor­ma­ti­on, con­sult intern­al­ly or still needs time.

Next step: Send rele­vant infor­ma­ti­on and agree on a spe­ci­fic fol­low-up time.

C‑Leads

Curr­ent­ly, the­re is no con­cre­te need or sui­ta­ble timing. The cont­act will be taken into account for a later approach – in com­pli­ance with the appli­ca­ble legal requirements. 

Next step: Docu­ment sen­si­bly and check again at the appro­pria­te time.

The underestimated opportunities in one’s own data stock

And thus to a point that is regu­lar­ly lost in the who­le deba­te about new chan­nels. Many com­pa­nies are con­stant­ly inves­t­ing time and money in new leads – while their own data­ba­ses and CRM sys­tems have num­e­rous cont­acts with whom a con­nec­tion has long been established: 

  • for­mer pro­s­pects and for­mer customers,
  • requests that are not con­sis­t­ent­ly tracked,
  • Cont­acts whe­re the timing was not right at the time,
  • Offers for which the­re was never a final response,
  • Par­ti­ci­pan­ts of pre­vious events,
  • long-stan­ding exis­ting cus­to­mers and cont­act per­sons who­se respon­si­bi­li­ties have changed.

The­se cont­acts should not only be stored, but also regu­lar­ly che­cked, prio­ri­ti­zed and addres­sed per­so­nal­ly. Becau­se a cont­act whe­re the­re was no need twel­ve or eigh­te­en months ago can be faced with a com­ple­te­ly dif­fe­rent situa­ti­on today. Mar­kets are shif­ting, bud­gets are being real­lo­ca­ted, respon­si­bi­li­ties are chan­ging, new pro­blems are emerging. 

This also appli­es express­ly to exis­ting cus­to­mers. They should not only get a call when some­thing is to be sold to them. A per­so­nal con­ver­sa­ti­on helps to iden­ti­fy chan­ges at an ear­ly stage, to under­stand new needs, to per­cei­ve dis­sa­tis­fac­tion befo­re ter­mi­na­ting, to iden­ti­fy addi­tio­nal oppor­tu­ni­ties and to initia­te recommendations. 

The con­se­quence is incon­ve­ni­ent, but rewar­ding: Your next orders may not be in a new­ly purcha­sed lead list, but alre­a­dy in your own CRM.

Reac­ti­va­ti­on does not mean cal­ling old lists indis­cri­mi­na­te­ly. It means intel­li­gent­ly sel­ec­ting exis­ting cont­acts, deve­lo­ping a rele­vant con­ver­sa­ti­on oppor­tu­ni­ty and per­so­nal­ly cla­ri­fy­ing what has chan­ged sin­ce the last exchange. 

The attitude of ComCare 360

At this point, trans­pa­ren­cy is cal­led for, becau­se Com­Ca­re 360 has a clear posi­ti­on on this topic – but a dif­fe­rent one than you might think. Com­Ca­re 360 does not only rely on tele­pho­ne com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on becau­se of a cur­rent Lin­ke­dIn trend. For many years, the com­pa­ny has been com­bi­ning dif­fe­rent chan­nels with per­so­nal dia­lo­gue to crea­te well-thought-out campaigns. 

Mana­ging Direc­tor Ingo Mar­ggraf is express­ly not an advo­ca­te of purely tra­di­tio­nal tele­pho­ne sales. On the con­tra­ry, he thinks in terms of tech­no­lo­gy and cam­paigns and has been deal­ing with the inter­ac­tion of mar­ke­ting, sales, data and tech­no­lo­gy for many years. He has hel­ped to build up mul­tich­an­nel soft­ware pro­vi­ders and agen­ci­es and was acti­ve in digi­tal mar­ke­ting at an ear­ly stage, inclu­ding in the envi­ron­ment of the Fede­ral Asso­cia­ti­on of the Digi­tal Eco­no­my and e‑mail marketing. 

The atti­tu­de behind this is the­r­e­fo­re not “back to the pho­ne and away from the new chan­nels”. It is: Use all sen­si­ble chan­nels – but don’t for­get to get peo­p­le tal­king to each other at the cru­cial points. 

The decisi­ve fac­tor is not which chan­nel is curr­ent­ly hyped on Lin­ke­dIn. The decisi­ve fac­tor is which chan­nel has the grea­test effect at which point in the pro­cess. New tech­no­lo­gies are used whe­re they make pro­ces­ses bet­ter, fas­ter and smar­ter. Peo­p­le come into play whe­re trust, under­stan­ding and com­mit­ment must arise.

Visibility creates reach. Conversations create business. 

The pho­ne is not making a come­back in B2B sales – becau­se it never real­ly dis­ap­peared in a pro­fes­sio­nal sales sys­tem. It was just dis­cus­sed quie­ter than the shi­nier digi­tal chan­nels for a while. 

Lin­ke­dIn, con­tent, email, AI, and auto­ma­ti­on are valuable com­pon­ents of modern cam­paigns. Howe­ver, they do not replace per­so­nal dia­lo­gue. Only when atten­ti­on beco­mes a con­cre­te cont­act, a cont­act beco­mes a qua­li­fied lead and a lead beco­mes a bin­ding next step, a sales is crea­ted that you can actual­ly con­trol – ins­tead of lea­ving it to chance. 

So per­haps the most honest ques­ti­on to your own sales depart­ment is not which new chan­nel to try out next. But: Is our sales a con­troll­able pro­cess – or do we main­ly post and send and then hope for reac­tions? When was the last time we sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly cont­ac­ted pre­vious inte­res­ted par­ties? And how many oppor­tu­ni­ties are curr­ent­ly unpro­ces­sed in our CRM?

💡 Key takeaways
The pho­ne has never been gone in pro­fes­sio­nal B2B sales – it is just being loud­ly “redis­co­ver­ed”.
Visi­bi­li­ty via Lin­ke­dIn, con­tent and out­reach is valuable, but sales alo­ne is not enough. Wit­hout a sequel, it remains “Post and Pray”.
No canal is the panacea. At cru­cial points, the tele­pho­ne is the link bet­ween digi­tal atten­ti­on and a real busi­ness rela­ti­onship.
A good pho­ne call does­n’t neces­s­a­ri­ly sell—it qua­li­fies, prio­ri­ti­zes (BANT, ABC), and estab­lishes a clear next step.
Your next orders are often not in a new lead list, but alre­a­dy in your own CRM.

Enough talking over the phone. Let’s put the theory into practice right away. 

You can reach us at +49 4102 7788770.

Or you can use our cont­act form and let us know when we can call you.

https://comcare360.de/kontakt/